PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Levi, Jelena AU - Das, Millie AU - Vasanawala, Minal S. AU - Behl, Deepti AU - Pomper, Martin AU - Forde, Patrick M. AU - Nakajima, Erica AU - Sayre, James AU - Shen, Bin AU - Cabrera, Hilda AU - Del Mar, Niko AU - Gullen, Michele AU - Pierini, Michele AU - Cox, Laura AU - Lokre, Ojaswita AU - Perk, Timothy AU - Chae, Hee-Don TI - [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG Uptake in Vertebral Bone Marrow May Predict Survival in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy AID - 10.2967/jnumed.124.268253 DP - 2024 Dec 01 TA - Journal of Nuclear Medicine PG - 1869--1875 VI - 65 IP - 12 4099 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/65/12/1869.short 4100 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/65/12/1869.full SO - J Nucl Med2024 Dec 01; 65 AB - Despite the systemic impact of both cancer and the associated immune response, immuno-PET is predominantly centered on assessment of the immune milieu within the tumor microenvironment. The aim of this study was to assess the value of [18F]F-AraG PET imaging as a noninvasive method for evaluation of system-wide immune status of patients with non–small cell lung cancer before starting immunotherapy. Methods: Eleven patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer were imaged with [18F]F-AraG before starting immunotherapy. Diagnostic [18F]FDG PET/CT scans were analyzed to assess differences in the extent of disease among patients. SUVmax, SUVmean, and total SUV (SUVtotal) from all tumor lesions, active lymph nodes, spleen, vertebral bone marrow, liver, thyroid, heart, and bowel were extracted from the baseline [18F]F-AraG scans, and discriminant and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to test their ability to predict patient response and overall survival. Results: The extent of the disease was variable in the patient cohort, but none of the [18F]FDG biomarkers associated with tumor burden (SUVmax, total metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis) was predictive of patient survival. The differences in the [18F]F-AraG and [18F]FDG distribution were observed both within and between lesions, confirming that they capture distinct aspects of the tumor microenvironment. Of the 3 SUV parameters studied, [18F]F-AraG SUVtotal provided a dynamic range suitable for stratifying tumors or patients according to their immune activity. [18F]F-AraG SUVtotal measured in the lumbar and sacral vertebrae differentiated between patients who progressed on therapy and those who did not with 90.9% and 81.8% accuracy, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients with high [18F]F-AraG SUVtotal in the lumbar bone marrow had significantly lower probability of survival than those with a low signal (P = 0.0003). Conclusion: This study highlights the significance of assessing systemic immunity and indicates the potential of the [18F]F-AraG bone marrow signal as a predictive imaging biomarker for patient stratification and treatment guidance.